rhodrymavelyne: (Default)
Once again Goodreads is refusing to post my review so I'm posting it here instead...

My feelings were torn as to whether or not give this four or five stars. In many ways this particular novel has earned the five stars. It’s a beautiful book about one of Anne Rice’s most darkly beautiful characters; one I keep seeing in many a favorite manga or anime character, “the frosty child” to quote from this story’s pages. I’ve seen Armand in many a Caravaggio, many a Guido Reni, a representation of St. Sebastian. He’s as eternal as these paintings; conveying a sensuous beauty mixed with innocence, a ruthlessness mixed with tenderness. He inspires carnal desire yet he’s profoundly spiritual in his detatchment from all things worldly. In many ways this story eclipses Pandora’s for passion and sheer heat, bringing both in fleshy relief in a more creative way than depicted in more traditional sex scenes. Marius’s painting described in Queen of the Damned; The Temptation of Amadeo is transformed into a tale in these pages, a tale of how Amadeo was tempted by the seductive immortality, embodied by the commanding, yet loving figure of Marius and his opulent unlife in Venice. First Amadeo was drawn into its luxury, later Marius’s blood-drenched world. Entering that world enabled Amadeo to remember Andrei, the divinely gifted child he once was, one with monks choosing a life of spiritual suffering, at odds with the father he adored whom was a lot like Lestat. Entering Marius’s world brought Amadeo into the orbit of the Children of Darkness who destroyed that world and Amadeo with it. Armand was reborn to darkness from the ashes under the loving, twisted guidance of Santino and Alessandra with a slight change to the canon, yet one which made perfect sense for the developing character of Armand within these pages.

The change that didn’t make sense regarded Claudia. The revelation about her was dropped into the story within warning, no hints leading up to it except perhaps a dream Lestat had in The Vampire Lestat and that’s a stretch. This part had Armand behaving in a manner which felt wildly out of character with the rest of what was being developed in this book and what he’s shown throughout the series. He showed an interest in something he’s never shown any interest in before unless you count his antics with the microwave in Queen of the Damned. It contradicts the canon so sharply, it begs a story in its own rights, not a confession dropped in the middle of this narrative. The way it was dropped made me seriously consider dropping the rating of this book to four stars.

In the end I didn’t. My love for the rest of the novel was too great. Sybelle and Benji were well-rounded, interesting additions to the cast. I was disappointed things didn’t work out for Armand and Daniel, but that was no surprise, no great contradiction to what had been established. The revelations about Daniel, Lestat, and Louis all felt like snapshots of Armand’s own broken heart, a desperate attempt to connect with a changing world in spite of his own eternally youthful face and body along with an unchanging nature. Armand’s moments with Lestat were among some of the most beautiful and powerful I’ve read in the series and an important epilogue to Memnoch the Devil. Armand’s snarky yet sympathetic portrayal of the other vampires made me laugh out loud, particularly the ones of Lestat and Gabrielle. Armand and Gabrielle shared a wonderful moment which felt like Part 2 of their philosophical smackdown in The Vampire Lestat. I’m a bit bewildered by Armand’s crush on Pandora but it didn’t feel as jarring and out of nowhere as Armand’s revelation about Claudia. The contempt and the confessions of love regarding Lestat, Louis, and the vampires at the theatre in Paris were both touching and great fun, fleshing out Armand a bit more along with his past selves of Amadeo and Andrei.

In the end I gave this book five stars. I erred on the side of love; love for Amadeo and Marius’s sizzling passion, young, hot flesh meeting the cool marble beauty of classical times in a unique and gorgeously described place and time; love for the Vampire Armand himself and all he represents. Over the years I’ve come to realize Armand is my favorite character in this series, except perhaps for Marius. God may reject Armand but I will not.
rhodrymavelyne: (Default)
I love Louis and Lestat from Anne Rice’s Vampire Chronicles, but how much is a protagonist the measure of his antagonist? I’ve pondered this question over the years, reading and re-reading Interview with the Vampire and The Vampire Lestat.

Armand was the character that made me crave this measure. He also made me shiver with appreciative awareness of the intense sensuality which can rise between enemies.

Armand was so many things depending on which one of The Vampire Chronicles he appeared in. I learned to look forward to his silent, steamy, yet ethereal presence whenever he showed up.

In Interview with the Vampire, he was the dark mentor, promising to overwhelm and seduce Louis with companionship, destroying anyone else who might interfere with this companionship. It’s impossible to resist even though we know it’s a relationship as doomed as the Dark Gift itself.

In The Vampire Lestat, he’s the alluring enemy who overwhelms Lestat with tempting illusions and his own desirability. There’s a tenderness between Lestat and Armand, which leaks through the fury raging between them, their diammetrically opposing personalities and ideals. It’s truly breathtaking, powerful, and at times, oddly comedic. Hey, it’s Lestat Armand is interacting with. Lestat is going to find the fun in all this, no matter how seriously Armand takes it. :)

For me, Armand truly found his stride in Queen of the Damned. He’s still the seducer, determined to have the one who kindled his passion and interest in the world around him. This time it’s Daniel Molloy, hapless boy who got Louis to tell his tale in Interview with the Vampire. Armand becomes absolutely hilarious in his wooing and pursuit of Daniel, while exploring modern technology, microwaves, video tapes, etc. In the end, Armand decides he knows what the 20th century is all about, incalcuable wealth. Armand is going to amass it and buy Daniel everything he could possibly desire.

As a teenager growing up in the 1980s (yes I was one of the ‘tender teenagers’ Lestat mentioned in Queen of the Damned), how I laughed over this, yet I understood it perfectly. 800 years of existence, only for Armand to decide to become a twentieth century sugar daddy. It was hilarious, yet it made perfect sense.

I’m now in my mid forties. During that time, I’ve seen other characters who’ve reminded me of Armand, particularly in anime and manga. Phantom in Marchen Awakens Romance. Gaara and Sasori in Naruto. Lonely boys whom hide a monster beneath their lovely faces, yet they stop being in essence lonely boys, longing for companionship. They seek out this companionship in the most sinister fashion, becoming even more monstrous, yet they never lose my sympathy, even when I’m rooting for their enemies. (Hey, I rooted for Louis, Lestat, and Daniel, too, although I loved the sensually charged adversity Armand brought to their lives…and unlives.) The enemies of these boys end up sympathizing with them, too, just as Louis, Lestat, and Daniel did. Often their sympathy made them all the angrier and more willing to oppose these monstrous boys whom they saw too much of themselves in.

Armand set the tone for adversaries I truly delight in. He didn’t stay an adversary. He got to be the protagonist in his own story, The Vampire Armand. This book explored the most powerful, central, and most adverserial relationship in Armand’s existence with one whom never was his adversary. It’s also the most loving. The bond with his master, Marius, portrayed with such loving romanticism when Armand shared his memories with Lestat, only to inspire Lestat to seek Marius out and form his own bond with him is fully explored and detailed.

Marius and Armand could dominate a blog of their own, the attempt to make a transitory bond between lover/beloved, master/pupil eternal and its grand failure. Or did it? The bond still exists, in spite of its strain.

I could blog about how much Guido Reni’s paintings, particularly San Sebastiano, make me think of Armand, the sensuality and detatched spirituality captured in his art. I’ve often wanted to ask Anne Rice about this. Hopefully I’ll get a chance to do so. :) I’ve often speculated about it in the context of The Vampire Chronicles world. Marius may not have been the first or the last artist to be inspired by Armand’s beauty. One can imagine a host of Baroque artists, maybe including Guido Reni himself getting fired up to capture it on canvas. :) Hmm, I wonder if the timing would be right for such a thing? Would Armand/Amadeo still have been in Rome for Reni and Bernini to catch a glimpse of him?

Armand is one of the first characters to truly inspire me, to reveal where I want to go with my own writing. He has become a character archetype for me of sensuality within antagonism.

Thank you, Andrei/Amadeo/Armand, for being such a vital source of inspiration over the years. Thank you, Anne Rice, for creating such a rich and many layered character who brings steam and complexity to any conflict he enters.

Profile

rhodrymavelyne: (Default)
rhodrymavelyne

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 11:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios